Reading the Fine Manual

Not directly related to finance but, an interesting dive into the history of the NE2000 network card and why Linux kernel devs hated it so much, complaining that people who used proprietary drivers had an easy time of it. The long and short of it seems to be, they were blaming the hardware but hadn't correctly read the documentation on how to program the hardware. For example:

For whatever reason, the Linux driver does not do things by the book, and there is a book. The Linux driver acknowledges receive interrupts as the last thing it does, which is simply backwards. It is important to keep in mind that the driver code which reads received packets from the DP8390’s ring buffer inevitably races the chip which may be receiving new packets at the same time. For that reason, it is necessary to acknowledge (clear) interrupts first, and then remove all received packets. The hardware works in the opposite order and first updates all of its state and writes to memory, and then raises an interrupt. That way, there could be a spurious interrupt for an already-processed packet but nothing will be missed.

The lesson is, if someone makes something and tells you how to use it, feel free to disregard that advice, but at least read and understand what they tell you first. Otherwise you risk breaking something you don't understand. Not that this would ever happen in finance . . . right . . .

Github falling further into Microsoft's clutches

Microsoft seems to be falling into the bad habit of disappearing any project they find economically or politically inconvenient. Self hosting and/or free software focused hosting is the way to go.

Rumblings at the Free Software Foundation

I was surprised to learn recently, though I guess I should have not been, of further issues at the FSF. If you recall, RMS was forced to depart a few years ago. Well, Alex Olivia points out that there has also been some rewriting of history and some very curious decisions made since then. But regardless urges people to resubscribe, and write that they are resubscribing based on RMS's recommendation.

But, besides recognizing the work the FSF keeps on doing, I am also hopeful because I perceive some things turning for the better. Because of this hope, there is something else that I am reasonably comfortable recommending and asking of those who'd trust the FSF better with Richard Stallman back in the board of directors:

Would you make a pledge to become a new member, or to renew your membership, if the FSF gets Richard back in the board of directors? Please email it to the FSF contact address (info), copying myself (oliva, at fsf or gnu).